Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NorthShark

The result was delete. Bduke (Discussion) 20:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

:{{la|NorthShark}} ([{{fullurl:NorthShark|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NorthShark}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article written mainly as promotional, without adhering to WP:NPOV ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 16:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

:Delete. No coverage, no products (on website or web), article copy is feeble attempt to change enough words from website to avoid copyvio, although the changes may have been more accidental than intent. Flowanda | Talk 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Flowanda. Advertisement that fails WP:CORP. No RS coverage found. Article is slightly modified copyvio of the company's website. • Gene93k (talk) 08:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, spam for non-notable company.--Grahame (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.