Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northcliff, Indiana
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Northcliff, Indiana}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northcliff, Indiana}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Northcliff, Indiana}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Northcliff, Indiana]]=
:{{la|1=Northcliff, Indiana}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Northcliff, Indiana}})
Yet another NN subdivision around Columbus that in this case sprung up around 1960. Searching was inhibited by a neighborhood in Bloomington and by Google's Artificially Unintelligent decision to treat "north" as a synonym of "Northcliff", but even so I found nothing. Mangoe (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Definately subdivision, https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-republic-northcliff-subdivision/143311945/, I checked back through time and found no evidence of a real place prior to the housing development. GNIS doesn't provide a citation for their entry. First mention is mid 20th century, Prior mentions are of a Lord northcliff that seemed to have some local interest for some reason.James.folsom (talk) 23:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.