Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa

=[[Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa]]=

:{{la|Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Notable_Chapels_in_Siolim,_Goa Stats])

:({{Find sources|Notable Chapels in Siolim, Goa}})

Topic is non-notable. Some part has been merged into Siolim#Chapels_in_Siolim The Discoverer (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Delete I can and do think that some travel guides would probably be able to establish notability of some churches in Siolim. I am in fact virtually certain of it. However, I do not see that the creator of this page has made any effort to establish the notability of the individual buildings or even of the topic itself as per WP:NOTABILITY. John Carter (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete I'm not seeing any notability here. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Siolim  Since the material in the article has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siolim&diff=497595294&oldid=497363792 merged], redirect needs to be retained for the attribution history.  I'm a bit confused as to whether the article intended that chapels were not the same as churches, while [http://goanchurches.com/Churches%20of%20Goa/North/Siolim/Churches%20of%20Goa%20-Our%20Lady%20of%20the%20Sea%20(Nossa%20Senhora%20do%20Mar),%20Oxel,%20Bardez.htm this] source was interesting.  Also, the use of the word "notable" in the article title cannot be construed to mean the same as wp:notable.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • MERGE with Siolim or Delete. Not notable. No reliable sources available or cited. So either Merge or delete. Better merge with Siolim without duplicating the contents already present in that page. --Bharathiya (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


  • Merge with Siolim or Delete The article can't stand alone due to its lack of notability. --Artene50 (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete; bad article title. The Discoverer (talk) 08:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.