Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurul Haq Nur

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Nurul Haq Nur}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nurul_Haq_Nur Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nurul Haq Nur}})

Failed WP:POLITICIAN. should be redirected 2018 Bangladesh quota reform movement per WP: SINGLEEVENT. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Per nom. --Hiwilms (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
• Strong and speedy keep. Nurul Haq is the most significant and most discussed activist of Bangladesh from the last three decades. He is already trending in the Bengali wikipedia. All the national dailies, televisions, and radios are covering his work every hour every day. Thanks. - St.teresa (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

::In the context of Bangladesh, he is far more significant than any of these student leaders already included in Wikipedia: Sarah Chadwick, Jaclyn Corin, Ryan Deitsch, Alfonso Calderon (activist), Emma González, David Hogg, Cameron Kasky, Alex Wind, etc. Thanks. - St.teresa (talk) 03:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

• Even as per both WP:POLITICIAN and WP: SINGLEEVENT, Nurul Haq is notable in every sense. As per WP:POLITICIAN, Haq is most notable in the recent history of Bangladesh because no other activist receives as much media coverage as he does, and as per WP: SINGLEEVENT, if "media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified." Then again, this is not a case of single event as the person is involved in many notable events in Bangladesh. The article is not deletable in accordance with any wikipedia policy. Thanks. - St.teresa (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
• {{disagree}} As per WP:1E if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified. He is being focused for last 3 years constantly for central and important mass uprisings. I think this title deserves a separate title. --Nahid Hossain (talk) 16:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

:*This subject is connected with several political/activist movements in Bangladesh (student movement, and quota system movement), per his interviews and WP:RS coverage below (and in the article); all of which have their own WP:GNG. Britishfinance (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Keep, as WP:POLITICIAN and WP: SINGLEEVENT he is notable.as A DUCSU VP and Quota Reform Movement Main Leader, he is not ignorable. You can check the view of this page log for the credibility. -- Jubair Sayeed Linas (talk) 03:30, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Though Dacsu VP is not good enough condition for staying in Wikipedia, but he has been widely discussed in the quota reform movement. As a result, he led one of the biggest movement in the history of the country. He did not appear only on the news of the quota movements, he himself has been discussing beyond that. There have been many incidents centered around him. In short, he was at the center of discussion for a long time. So, I have an opinion on keeping the article. Shahidul Hasan Roman (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. . He is not properly a politician person. His news has been made to elect against the Bangladesh Chhatra League. —Swe123123 (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

:* He doesn't to meet WP:POLITICIAN as he meets WP:GNG (see my comments below), the most fundamental WP criteria. Britishfinance (talk) 00:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. Failing WP:POLITICIAN is not relevent here (plus, the subject is an activist and not part of the mainstream political process at this stage). The subject definately meets WP:GNG with coverage and interviews in several WP:RS, such as: Bdnews24.com [https://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2019/03/12/in-stunning-upset-quota-protest-leader-nur-elected-ducsu-vp], Dhaka Tribune [https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/event/2019/03/08/i-accepted-the-government-s-decision-to-avoid-being-repressed] and The Daily Star (Bangladesh) [https://www.thedailystar.net/star-weekend/interview/news/conversation-the-man-the-moment-1718446] (which is a WP:SIGCOV). These (and several others that I can see online) are proper interviews on the subject in notable quality independent publications. That is WP:GNG. Britishfinance (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.