Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nushki railway station

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Nushki railway station}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nushki_railway_station Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nushki railway station}})

No coverage found, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 16:50, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

: Strongly Keep [https://web.archive.org/web/20140224124331/http://pakrail.com/ Official Web Site of Pakistan Railway's] archive page should be enough. [http://beta.dawn.com/news/181676/rocket-attack-damages-goods-train Here is] another link showing this railway station.Ameen Akbar (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

::The first link is not WP:INDEPENDENT and the second one is routine coverage of a terror attack on the railway station. Neither helps (at all) with notability. buidhe 19:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

• Keep - An actual mainline rail station that comes with inherent notability. Such a station in the UK or US would never even be considered for afd. Might this be a case of systemic bias? Oakshade (talk) 04:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

::{{u|Oakshade}} Any guidlines you can cite that they are inherently notable? I don't think so, as every article should pass WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

• Keep Former terminus of politically and economically significant railway ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=s-x0sYTztvYC&pg=PA143], [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03068371908724762]) but then its importance was considered so great the line was extended and it ceased to be a terminus ([https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00369220208733340], [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies/article/sstn-in-british-indian-frontier-policy/5CBE1A9B56836F406E9358EACAF1DD32]).--Pontificalibus 12:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. We generally keep all railway stations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

::What is this? Please demonstrate, as you are using circular reasoning. Störm (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.