Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OISE - Oxford Intensive School of English

:{{la|OISE - Oxford Intensive School of English}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OISE_-_Oxford_Intensive_School_of_English Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|OISE - Oxford Intensive School of English}})

No evidence of any notability. Refs are very lightweight and one is a ref for the CEO and not the organisation. The other two appear to be press releases. Fails WP:CORP  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   11:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

• Comment Yes, this is shameless self-promotion, but possibly someone could clean up the page before deletion?ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 11:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
• Comment: It is worth noting the previous AfD deletion of OISE Language Coaching. AllyD (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
• Comment: Newspaper article (it does not look like a press release) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/gap-year-travel/gap-year-100-companydirectorylearningaskilllanguage/ The Telegraph -- Sherpalibre
• Comment: TV coverage (not a promo one) http://lci.tf1.fr/jt-20h/videos/2015/vacances-de-la-toussaint-les-sejours-linguistiques-ont-du-succes-8673626.html MYTF1 -- Sherpalibre
• Comment: Charitable organization video (in partnership with OISE) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02tA06ePDac Toutes à l’école -- Sherpalibre
• Comment: if you still think it is "shameless" self-promotion, I agree with the "cleaning up procedure" -- Sherpalibre —Preceding undated comment added 12:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: In case this could help, here are some accreditations for the organization https://www.britishcouncil.org/education/accreditation/centres/o British Council, http://www.englishuk.com/en/members/member-directories/language-centre-directory?letter_index=O&keywords=®ion_hq=0 English UK, http://www.educationaloversight.co.uk/schools/8681/ Private Further Education for OISE Oxford, http://www.educationaloversight.co.uk/schools/8680/ Private Further Education for OISE Bristol -- Sherpalibre —Preceding undated comment added 10:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

:*Comment: Accreditation listings are no doubt important operationally, as enablers for a firm to go about its business, but are not in themselves evidence of notability in an encyclopaedic sense. AllyD (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: Another link http://www.bginette.com/ Lycée Privé Sainte-Geneviève -- Sherpalibre (talk) 10:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete no evidence of passing WP:CORPDEPTH. SSTflyer 03:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as nothing suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. If the promotionalism were removed, there would be nothing left except a directory entry. DGG ( talk ) 01:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.