Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OJ (programming tool)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=OJ (programming tool)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=OJ (programming tool)}})

Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:* Delete per nom, fails WP:NSOFT 🌊PacificDepths^talk|contrib 07:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

:

::*Keep Currently the only rationale is violating WP:NSOFT which is an essay not a guideline. The original conference paper for this programming tool[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-45046-7_7] (when it was named openjava) has been cited 293 times according to google scholar. There are additional sources indicating this has been the topic of instruction in university courses. It appears to be subject of focus in some schools at least: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15740-1_100]] which could mean it "passes" NSOFT despite the delete votes claiming otherwise. Given WP:PRESERVE and the lack of appropriate deletion rationale, this article should be kept until better research is done in favor of deletion at the very least.

::Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.