Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Tree Business Systems

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Oak Tree Business Systems]]=

:{{la|Oak Tree Business Systems}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oak_Tree_Business_Systems Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Oak Tree Business Systems}})

I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 00:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: A :WP:SPA article on a niche document management provider. The provided references are routine coverage and my searches are not finding better. Fails :WP:CORPDEPTH, :WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:54, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. This fails notability. --Lockley (talk) 20:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 11:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.