Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objekat 101

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Objekat 101]]=

:{{la|Objekat 101}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Objekat 101}})

One source was a dead link. I tried multiple spellings but there isn't anything citable. Marcus Qwertyus 21:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 21:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 21:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 21:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy delete - Blatant hoax. Bosnia? Really? "Black Eagle" links are to a Russian MBT prototype. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

:*My experience has shown that admins will usually not delete articles like these unless there is a really absurdly blatant reason to delete. Marcus Qwertyus 22:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

::*I think "images of a known Russian MBT prototype being claimed as a Bosnian-designed-and-developed tank" would be a pretty good reason. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

:::*Could easily be a placeholder image for an object 101 based on the Black Eagle chassis. Marcus Qwertyus 22:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete - as unverifiable. It may be a hoax or maybe not. But there are no sources available to verify anything including this thing's existence or proposed existence. -- Whpq (talk) 14:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - as unverifiable. I tried finding any mention of it. No sources have been able to show it's proposed existence. Image appears to be standard blueprint of russian MBT.MOLEY (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - lacks "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources and therefore fails the general notability guideline. Its is also unverifiable. Anotherclown (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.