Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observation of a Waiter

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Observation of a Waiter]]=

:{{la|Observation of a Waiter}} ([{{fullurl:Observation of a Waiter|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Observation of a Waiter}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable film, possibly even a hoax as I get zero hits on google for "Observation of a Waiter" which for an existing or even planned film is highly unusual. Passportguy (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. Going with WP:CRYSTAL on this one, bad case of it. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per my simul-PROD: WP:CRYSTAL, future film by non-notable film maker, stars haven't even been signed, candidate for speedy deletion. (Furthermore, a Google search on the director shows nothing notable, I doubt the intended stars have ever heard of him.) --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 23:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. No assertion of notability, and no evidence of its existence, certainly no evidence of notability. Dawn Bard (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Dawn Bard (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete and possible SALT. not only is there no notability but the premise sounds like the least interesting film I have ever heard. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

:*Comment I disagree with salting the page. It is possible that someone, sometime, somewhere, may use the same title for a project that on completion will satisfy the usual requirements for verifiability and notability. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete for many reasons: short film, production not yet started, starring celebrities who have not agreed to act in the film, and may not even know about it. Hairhorn (talk) 17:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.