Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oil Spill Response

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Oil Spill Response}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oil Spill Response}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Oil Spill Response}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Oil Spill Response]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Oil Spill Response}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Oil Spill Response}})

No evidence of notability. None of the sources are both independednt and reliable and discuss the company. No doubt an emminently worthwhile company , but searches failed to find appropriate sources. The sort of company that probably has a low public profile. At present this fails WP:GNG but would be happy to be proved wrong if suitable sources can be found.  Velella  Velella Talk   07:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.