Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oizea Type

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 16:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Oizea Type]]=

:{{la|Oizea Type}} ([{{fullurl:Oizea Type|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oizea Type}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unable to find any significant independent coverage of the topic in reliable sources. Bongo matic 17:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Reads like an ad. Searches turn up nothing but a couple ads and spam-like blog posts by "Oizea Hatcher." Even in these, it's presented as a "prototype." Jlg4104 (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.