Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Stagers

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Old Stagers]]=

:{{la|Old Stagers}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Old_Stagers Stats])

:({{Find sources|Old Stagers}})

Non notable amateur theatre club, passing mentions in two sources, but most of this stub is unsourced and I cannot find any substantial coverage as required by the notability guidelines. PROD declined. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)>

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep - the article could certainly do with improvement, but I think there is enough there to establish notability. The Old Stagers is very well known in cricket circles for its long association with Canterbury Cricket Week, and I am sure that additional citations should not be difficult to come by. JH (talk page) 18:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Search for "Old Stagers" Canterbury on GBooks clinches it for me. The sources which mention the Old Stagers might not go into huge depth, but there are so many varied sources over such a long period of time I think it's earned its place. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:::What is required is substantial coverage not snippets from nineteenth century magazines without any details. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.