Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleena

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily Deleted -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 02:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Oleena]]=

:{{la|Oleena}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleena}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Oleena}})

Was tagged for speedy deletion but submitter obviously wants to keep it, so putting it forward for AFD AIRcorn (talk) 07:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete ( CSD A7) I have restored the speedy deletion tag which was removed by the article's author. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, a list of gigs isn't an entry or a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete I could not possibly agree more with JamesBWatson and Gene93k. Evalpor (talk) 23:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete not even an article, and if cleaned up and fully rewritten still wouldn't be notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable - Does not meet qualifications for notability --SuperHappyPerson (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)SuperHappyPerson

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.