Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Diaz

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Olga Diaz]]=

:{{la|1=Olga Diaz}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Olga Diaz}})

Fails WP:NPOL. Most of the available coverage is routine and local or not significant enough. Funny enough, there's [https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-escondido-wikipedia-deletes-entry-for-2010oct25-story.html this 2010 article] in The San Diego Union-Tribune reporting that "Wikipedia officials have deleted the entry for Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz on their site, contending that she is not notable enough to have her own page on the popular online encyclopedia." Mooonswimmer 03:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Women, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

:*Delete: Does not meet WP:NPOL as she is not a major local official. But LMAO over the article cited about. Rublamb (talk) 14:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.