Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Hime

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Olivia Hime]]=

:{{la|Olivia Hime}} ([{{fullurl:Olivia Hime|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Hime}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-notable singer and lyricist. Damiens.rf 04:46, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 08:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep-- She has an extensive discography: [http://cliquemusic.uol.com.br/artistas/olivia-hime.asp 1], [http://www.cduniverse.com/sresult.asp?HT_Search=xartist&HT_Search_Info=Hime%2C+Olivia&cart=826368844 2], meets criteria #5 of WP:MUSIC.--Jmundo (talk) 17:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Together with her husband, she owns the indie label that releases her records. That are self-published albums. --Damiens.rf 21:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: no independent verifiable 3rd party sources WP:MUSIC. JamesBurns (talk) 01:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep – She was nominated for a Latin Grammy for Best Brazilian Song (for "Cancao Transparente") in 2005. (Source: Los Angeles Times August 24, 2005, p. E1.) And her albums have been reviewed in major newspapers such as Reforma (September 22, 2002, p. 12). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Changed vote to keep: per Paul Erik. Not because of the album reviews, but because of being nominated for a major award. Schuym1 (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.