Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmPuff

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 00:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[OmPuff]]=

:{{la|OmPuff}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmPuff}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|OmPuff}})

Re-creation of speedy-deleted page, unless he has become more notable since. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:22, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep - Recreation of a speedily deleted page is not a valid reason for deletion (you may be thinking of G4 speedy deletion, "recreation of a page deleted by a deletion discussion"). Significant coverage [http://www.museke.com/node/2234 here] in which OmPuff is nominated for a Namibian Music Award, which could arguably satisfy WP:BAND. Despite the fact that the official language of Namibia is English, relatively low levels of internet access would give us reason to believe that sources might exist which would not easily be found online. (See WP:BIAS) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep Am I missing something or has no real argument been made here? Shii (tock) 22:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

:*I was inclined to read "unless he has become more notable since" as a suggestion that he didn't meet WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.