Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnicon (2nd nomination)
=[[Omnicon]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omnicon}}
:{{la|Omnicon}} – (
:({{Find sources|Omnicon}})
I am not really voting delete. Previous AfD said "There shall be no prejudice against speedy renomination". Hoping to get better consensus or something this time.I vote to redirect to List_of_Transformers:_Energon_characters#Omnicons with the page history intact, so that any content that might deserve moving can be moved. NotARealWord (talk) 06:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- KEEP and SPEEDY CLOSE, the nominator himself admits he doesn't want it deleted, so why is there a deletion nomination at all? If the nominator wants it to be redirected, then propose a redirection, and if no one objects, impliment it. Mathewignash (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
:*Himself? When did I ever tell you people I was or was not male? Also, I wanted to start a deletion review, remember. But King of hearts didn't let me. NotARealWord (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
::*I have no knowledge or interest in your gender, just the incorrect use of a deletion review. If you want an article redirected, you propose that. Deletion reviews are NOT to be used to strongarm an article into redirecting. Mathewignash (talk) 22:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, speedy close. This is not a proposal for deletion, but a discussion that should take place on the article talk page. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.