Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One97 Communications

:{{la|One97 Communications}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/One97_Communications Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|One97 Communications}})

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

• Keep The first reference on the article indicates that Alibaba has purchased 25% of the company. That makes it sufficiently notable for inclusion. Richard Harvey (talk) 06:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
• Redirect to Alibaba Group - Article does not seem notable itself, but could be mentioned in its parent's article. CookieMonster755 (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
• Merge/Redirect to Alibaba Group This company has only received coverage by proxy of Alibaba so a redirect is appropriate. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect salvageable content to Alibaba Group as suggested. It's probably Paytm that's really going to be notable not so much on One97, note that the article has zero attribution for the history section. — Brianhe (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep Sources may be hard to find, since they are an Indian company, but I have a hard time seeing deletion for any company with 1,200 employees. CorporateM (Talk) 16:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
• Comment - While I believe there are enough sources to support notability, I would say that the more pressing issue is the Paytm article which reads like a press release. I don't want to vote keep for this one as I am unsure if it should be kept and merged into Paytm or Paytm merged into One97. Maybe someone who has looked at it longer has some ideas. Just a thought. --TTTommy111 (talk) 05:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

• Keep, article looks well written enough to support its notability. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep: about 106 mentions in HighBeam. Although most are passing mentions, some seem to be significant coverage. Esquivalience ^t 15:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep - enough sourcing appears to be available. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.