Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onecyze project

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

=[[Onecyze project]]=

:{{la|Onecyze project}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Onecyze_project Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Onecyze project}})

does not meet Wikipedia's general guidelines for notability, is written like a resume for the band, and cites exclusively primary/promotional sources Interlaker (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as it stands, 'cos no third-party sources in years. Did they have anything not self-released? - David Gerard (talk) 07:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Not one independent source. — Ben Ben (talk) 17:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Insufficient coverage reliable sources to support notability.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 18:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:BAND test and no reliable sources. How can an article written almost entirely in lowercase letters lasted 7 years? Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.