Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onkar Ghate
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Onkar Ghate}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onkar Ghate}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Onkar Ghate}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Onkar Ghate]]=
:{{la|1=Onkar Ghate}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Onkar Ghate}})
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NACADEMIC. This article reads more like a resume than anything else. I could find no sources to establish this guy's notability. SparklyNights 22:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Finance, Economics, and Canada. SparklyNights 22:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. His own writings and non-independent profiles from the places he writes for are available, but not independent, reliable source coverage. Even recent books covering the Objectivist movement don't discuss him. --RL0919 (talk) 06:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.