Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenXMA

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to ask me for a copy of the deleted content if you want to perform a merge. Der yck C. 12:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[OpenXMA]]=

:{{la|OpenXMA}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|OpenXMA}})

I found no notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Merge to online banking: banking protocols are mainly of technical interest and as lacking general interest part don't normally deserve separate articles. Though, information about available protocols may be of interest to readers looking for online banking information. I think the best way would be to create a subsection of the target article listing the available online banking protocols and tools and land the short description of OpenXMA (with history information stripped) there. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Delete I'm seeing zero independent coverage of this. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 17:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:N and no independent coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.