Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open bowling

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (inform) @ 20:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Open bowling]]=

:{{la|Open bowling}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Open_bowling Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Open bowling}})

This seems to be wp:original research. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep This seems to be a hasty nomination. See [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=s5I16iRNcsEC&pg=PA119 Bowling Fundamentals]. Andrew D. (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Speedy Keep . This article was produced by sloppy splitting from Ten-pin bowling. Bowlers-wikipedians need to be alerted. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep - Why not re-add back in to Ten-pin bowling ?, Anyway I can't seem to find much but then again I'm no bowling expert which is what we need right now!.... I'll just go with Keep & Improve although if anyone did wanna shove it back I have no issues with that. –Davey2010^Talk 02:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.