Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation R.E.L.P

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Operation R.E.L.P]]=

:{{la|Operation R.E.L.P}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Operation R.E.L.P}})

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. ttonyb (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete in agreement with nominator. Article as nominated [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_R.E.L.P&action=historysubmit&diff=409291900&oldid=409290884] appears set only for self-promotion of an otherwise non-notable film. To quote the article, "Operation R.E.L.P was released in limited quantities and has only had two public showings. As it was a not-for-profit production, the film was never sold. However, a one-off limited edition version was created, but only distributed amongst the production crew.". In searching, we find it had no distribution, only two public screenings, and no reliable sources speaking toward the film. Fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable film, no coverage in WP:RS. --Kinu t/c 09:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*poke* 02:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete two public showings and no physical release? Geez. I've literally made more notable movies in my backyard. And that's even assuming this even exists. Not on IMDB or even on Google ("Did you mean Operation Repo?"). The names in the article are pretty unlikely too... Kaiser Wilhelm von Shakespertin? Woof Woof and Co? Sounds like a hoax and/or just kids messing around. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.