Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operational Quality of Release

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 19:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Operational Quality of Release]]=

:{{la|Operational Quality of Release}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Operational Quality of Release}})

Absolutely no context, and given the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operational_Quality_of_Release&diff=315869649&oldid=315754296 information on creation] I'd say both WP:OR and quite possibly WP:MADEUP Ironholds (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete Someone cut and pasted crud. Fifelfoo (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete This ... it is clearly WP:OR and without citations should be removed.--WngLdr34 (talk) 20:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete as [http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-baf1.htm bafflegab]. And also as original research as I can find no reference to this term to support it as a standard measure within an IT management methodology. -- Whpq (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete I can't even slightly understand what this means! Smartse (talk) 13:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.