Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orange-breasted

=[[Orange-breasted]]=

:{{la|Orange-breasted}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Orange-breasted}})

Orange-breasted is a part heading Snowman (talk) 13:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Speedy Close, no valid reason for deletion stated. This is a disambig page and seems to be working fine. meshach (talk) 20:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

:*You probably would not say that, if you were aware of the guideline WP:PTM. Please read this guideline and reconsider. Snowman (talk) 22:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

::*Change to Delete per nom and WP:PTM. Thanks to Snowmanradio for his civil note! meshach (talk) 23:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

:::*Of course, you could argue that this is a special case or that the WP:PTM guideline should be removed. Snowman (talk)

:-- JHunterJ (talk) 12:19, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - agree with nom. search-clutter. Exit2DOS CtrlAltDel 07:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.