Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchard Skate Shop
=[[Orchard Skate Shop]]=
:{{la|Orchard Skate Shop}} – (
:({{findsources|Orchard Skate Shop}})
fails WP:CORP. advertisement masquerading as an article. 1 hit in gnews [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Orchard+Skate+Shop&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. LibStar (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Coverage in Weekly Dig is insubstantial; other references are dead or irrelevant to notability. Article has a promotional tone. TheFeds 20:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete It seems a shame to lose a reference to someone with the wonderful name of "Broderick Gumpright", but no, there's insufficient notability and it's somewhat promotional in tone. -- Boing! said Zebedee 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete-As per nom, fails WP:CORP , not notable skate shop. Off2riorob (talk) 22:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.