Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otilia Bruma
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy close as the article was already deleted again by User:RHaworth. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
=[[Otilia Bruma]]=
:{{la|Otilia Bruma}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Otilia Bruma}})
This was speedily deleted twice ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otilia_(singer)], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Otilia+Bruma]), and with good reason: the article's subject is a random would-be starlet, with no plausible claim to notability, as defined by the relevant policies. - Biruitorul Talk 17:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
::Comment: How rude and disrespectful. Otilia already has an article on the Turkish Wikipedia, and it is allowed for the article to be translated into other languages including English. Leave her alone. Chinesemusicfan (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
:::Doesn't seem rude or disrespectful at all - I read it as an objective viewpoint based on suitability guidelines. Nominator is quite justified in that conclusion as that is what the evidence suggests. Subject doesn't meet WP:MUS. Moot now as decision has been made.Rayman60 (talk) 22:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.