Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ototrend

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Ototrend]]=

:{{la|Ototrend}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ototrend}})

Delete. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals. No independent references. Contested prod. WWGB (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete. Per Wikipedia:Notability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals and WWGB. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 20:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.