Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.R.Harikumar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[P.R.Harikumar]]=

:{{la|P.R.Harikumar}} ([{{fullurl:P.R.Harikumar|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.R.Harikumar}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article was previously deleted at CSD. It has since been recreated by a different author. Article has multiple issues, not much improved upon by the first version. Not eligible for CSD because of notability issues. No articles link to it, and it is a dead-end. Neu_tralle 12:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Neu_tralle 12:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Neu_tralle 12:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete, post hatse. Way too promotional (self-promo?). Looks like it was written by his PR person, assuming that PR person wasn't very good at what he or she does. I realize that The Hindu is a reliable source, but something about the text in the references cited comes across as somewhat promotional as well. I just don't think he passes notability standards. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete of this self-promotion. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete Even if we take his achivements at face value he does not seem to meet any notability criteria. He has one state level award althought the award's notability itself is debatable. --Deepak D'Souza 08:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.