Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. V. Ramesh

:{{la|P. V. Ramesh}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/P._V._Ramesh Stats])

:({{Find sources|P. V. Ramesh}})

there is an assertion of notability, but there are few sources, and it's impossible to ascertain genuine notability with this cv masquerading as a bio  Ohc ^¡digame! 04:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 04:38, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. Very senior civil servant at a level which should give him automatic notability (and certainly would do if he was at this level in the USA or UK). -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
• Keep -The sources are solid and varied. He may not be notable to us but he does seem to be a notable person in India and within the UN. Orasis (talk) 06:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
• Keep A subject with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources is generally considered to be notable. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 18:57, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Per Orasis. Poor article, but not so promotional as nominator implies. And there are good sources that establish his notability. —innotata 04:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.