Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCell (telecommunications)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Artemis Networks#Technology. MBisanz talk 02:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
=[[:PCell (telecommunications)]]=
:{{la|PCell (telecommunications)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|PCell (telecommunications)}})
The claims for the product have not been backed by public data after several years. This is a single product company that has not even delivered that product. Fails Wikipedia inclusion criteria in several ways. Daveburstein (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 24. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge Into Artemis Networks. Comatmebro (talk) 03:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: There is already equally adequate coverage of the technology claims under :Artemis_Networks#Technology. No purpose to a separate article at this point and no evidence of distinct notability. AllyD (talk) 07:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or merge/redirect. Old marketing/spam, or at least fails WP:GNG. At best, merge/redirect to Artemis Networks. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.