Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVN Acharya

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

=[[PVN Acharya]]=

:{{la|PVN Acharya}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PVN_Acharya Stats])

:({{Find sources|PVN Acharya}})

Doesn't seem to meet WP:SCHOLAR. All the references are to papers or conference presentations, etc. I can find [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=W1waAAAAIBAJ&sjid=KioEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5454,1974738&dq=pvn+acharya&hl=en] which is a casual mention of him, but Google books with variations on his name didn't produce anything useful, but others may have more luck. Dougweller (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. 01:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 01:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Delete. The article itself gives strong evidence that he doesn't meet WP:SCHOLAR (at least, assuming that whoever decided not to give him tenure did so for good reason), the citation record in Google scholar also doesn't show much evidence of impact, and there's no evidence of WP:GNG in other forms either. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.