Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Pacheco Avila

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 10:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

=[[Pablo Pacheco Avila]]=

:{{la|Pablo Pacheco Avila}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Pablo Pacheco Avila}})

Notability tied to just one event. Damiens.rf 15:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - Not very much as far as references go. WP:BLP1E comes into play, as noted by nom. Not all those arrested during this event are inherently notable. Grsz11 15:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Black Spring (Cuba) as a plausable search term. Lugnuts (talk) 09:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Every individual included in Amnesty International's list demonstrates continuing international coverage, and usually for significant things. Their descriptions always provide enough information to write an article--which could be fuller than the present one. This is not a matter of the sort of tabloid event intended by BLP 1E. DGG ( talk ) 02:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect - a case of WP:SINGLEEVENT. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:01, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per DGG's analysis. The fact that a large group of individuals is associated with a particular event does not mean that is the only event relating to ther notability, and prisoners of conscience, especially those recognized by Amnesty International and by Reporters Without Borders, typically have generated significant nontrivial coverage for their activities. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // ark // 21:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

  • keep per broad news coverage (link above) over many years negating 1E issues. Plus per DGG/HW. Hobit (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.