Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PacificFlier

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 00:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[PacificFlier]]=

:{{la|PacificFlier}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|PacificFlier}})

This airline was only operational for four months, which in my opinion should not be enough to pass the general notability guideline. Also, I cannot see any significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, thus it clearly fails WP:CORP. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 07:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Keep - the length of time it was in operation shouldn't be a determinant of notability IMO, and I had no difficulty in finding coverage of the airline on reliable websites in Australia, Fiji and Micronesia. YSSYguy (talk) 03:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.