Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddington Bear's Gold Record

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have reverted my earlier merge close after a closer examination of the article. There is not a single citation anywhere and thus nothing to merge per WP:V. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Paddington Bear's Gold Record]]=

:{{la|Paddington Bear's Gold Record}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paddington_Bear%27s_Gold_Record Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Paddington Bear's Gold Record}})

I brought this here because I was not entirely sure if it should be speedied for a lack of a notable musical artist. There's a total lack in coverage; in fact [http://www.foodbev.com/news/robertsons-limited-edition-paddington-bear-golden-shred-marmalade/ the marmalade] gets more sources and probably tastes better! TheGracefulSlick (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete. The lack of a notable recording artist, or even a credited recording artist, would not be a problem if the album met the notability criteria for albums, but it doesn't seem to. The article's writing style seems somewhat opinionated, with comments such as "The voice talent recruited for this album is fitting and effective. ... Paddington belts out the final tune to this unknown gem of a recording", and made me wonder whether the article might have been copied from another source, but I haven't found any such source. It may be preferable to mention the existence of this album in the Paddington Bear article rather than having a separate article for the album. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Merge into Paddington Bear, per Metropolitan 90. It's nothing more than a piece of trivia that this record exists. ↅ𝜞 _{(Contact me) (See my edits)} 12:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.