Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pajak pół kilo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Copyright violation Mgm|^(talk) 08:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Pajak pół kilo]]=

:{{la|Pajak pół kilo}} ([{{fullurl:Pajak pół kilo|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pajak pół kilo}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

A non-notable legend. Cannot find any mention of this in reliable, third party sources. The text is a copy-and-paste from what seems to be a blog. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 19:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. The 'reference' provided is evidence enough, it seems, of its notability. Drmies (talk) 20:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment The text is a copy-and-paste from what seems to be a blog. -- So shouldn't the article just be deleted (well, blanked, but there's nothing left after that) outright as a copyvio? Unless the article's author is claiming to be the author of the "source" too? If it is later determined that the article actually is notable, it can be recreated with better sourcing and less copy-pasting. -Bbik^★ 21:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.