Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pajaritos, bravos muchachitos

:{{la|Pajaritos, bravos muchachitos}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pajaritos,_bravos_muchachitos Stats])

:({{Find sources|Pajaritos, bravos muchachitos}})

WP:NALBUMS JacobiJonesJr (talk) 08:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

::I come from the Spanish Wikipedia, so first of all I apologize in advance because I might make some mistakes assuming that both Wikipedias' guidelines are alike. I might need a better explaination since I'm not familiar with the specifics of enWiki.

::It it stated that the article might not be notable enough according to WP:NALBUMS where all that is said is that relevance is not inherited and as long as an album meets the general notability guideline it should be fine.

::I'm not incurring on an inherited relevance argument since the article has plenty of references about the album itself. It meets the GNG because it has recieved significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject. That is: Many articles on nationwide distribution printed and Web media in Argentina talk with detail about the album. To name some of them La Nación, Página/12, Télam, Rolling Stone (Argentina), Todo Noticias, Radio Continental.

::So all in all, I think the content is properly referenced, verifiable, and deserves to stay in Wikipedia. Whether it should have an article of its own, or be under the discography section of Indio Solari is something I'm not confident enough to say.

::Last, I'd like to state that altough in Wikipedia:NALBUMS#Recordings it's suggested to read WikiProject Classical Music's guideline notability of recordings I take this as what it's said to be: "advice about style". I don't think it should be put above more broadly accepted guidelines.

::Regards. --Facu89 (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. Based on the footnotes already in the article this appears to have sufficient coverage in reliable Spanish-language sources. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 02:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep Am I missing something? The Spanish language sources appear to provide more than enough evidence of meeting GNG. --j⚛e decker^talk 15:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.