Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palaeocharinus
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW and WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
=[[Palaeocharinus]]=
:{{la|Palaeocharinus}} – (
:({{Find sources|Palaeocharinus}})
Should be written by some expert with proper references Sulaimandaud (talk) 10:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- The article was 34 minutes old when you nominated it for deletion. It is [https://www.google.cz/search?tbm=bks&hl=cs&q=palaeocharinus+genus&gws_rd=ssl#hl=cs&q=palaeocharinus+&tbm=bks a valid encyclopedic topic]. Why don't you ask for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arthropods instead of deletion attempts? It would be more constructive. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 11:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - looks like a great start on an article that others can build on. AdventurousMe (talk) 13:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. This genus has been discussed in published books and journal articles. --Animalparty-- (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Did you even check Google Scholar? Seems sufficiently notable to me--– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 04:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Clearly notable subject; totally invalid deletion criterion. WP:TROUT for the nom. -- 101.117.88.7 (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)— 101.117.88.7 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep Not sure why this was nominated. Clearly notable - article just needs work. SNOW KEEP now. --Jersey92 (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.