Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palamon Capital Partners
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Palamon Capital Partners]]=
:{{la|1=Palamon Capital Partners}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Palamon Capital Partners}})
nonnoitable private equity firm - Altenmann >talk 23:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
:Delete Non notable corporation with no sources except that they bought another company. Wikipedia is not a directory or catalog of every business. I do complement the article's author, however. They did a wonderful job in formatting. Bluefist talk 02:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - no assertion of notability. Most holding companies are not automatically notable because of their assets; see WP:NCORP and WP:NOTINHERITED. If information about why it’s notable is added, then it would be notable. Bearian (talk) 01:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I agree that the notability is not inhereited from the companies it has purchased or taken stakes in. However, I do see coverage from the [https://www.ft.com/content/0049a468-4be5-11e5-b558-8a9722977189 Financial] [https://www.ft.com/content/2de69a66-fa77-11e5-8f41-df5bda8beb40 Times] that seems to have a bit of depth into how the firm operates and goes beyond merely reporting transactions. [https://www.wsj.com/articles/palamon-pays-over-100-million-for-majority-stake-in-insurance-technology-company-1531839200 I] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/palamon-capital-partners-takes-stake-in-happy-socks-1484682205 am] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/palamon-buys-provider-of-psychometric-tests-1517418444 also] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/palamon-scores-13-times-return-on-towry-exit-1459865609 seeing] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0020140109ea19goi0w a] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0020120905e895jipby metric] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/palamon-sells-eye-clinic-to-nordic-capital-1520951892 ton] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/numis-founder-joins-private-equity-firm-palamon-1500651813 of] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0020140729ea7tof8j9 coverage] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0120151019ebajhwvcj from] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0120150812eb8cik6ny The] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0020131211e9cbgiv57 Wall] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/DJFLBO0120150617eb6hpom8z Street] [https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB988815331388731418 Journal] about this firm and its activities, though much of it is transaction reporting. My hunch is that this firm is probably notable, but it's a bit hard for me to prove until I have more time to do a source dive. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- You may request to WP:DRAFTIFY of WP:USERFY it and work at your pace if you have an interest. - Altenmann >talk 04:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, the sourcing to date all relies entirely on information provided by the company therefore there no in-depth "Independent Content" about the company. HighKing++ 17:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.