Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paradise London

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Paradise London]]=

:{{la|Paradise London}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paradise_London Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Paradise London}})

No substantial content, repeated attempts at inserting promotional content, linking it to related individuals/associated businesses. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Mduvekot (talk) 12:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Delete Per nom, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. From what I have read in a few sources, nothing significantly notable sets the article subject apart from other other branding agencies, leading me to consider WP:MILL. For the record, I do not find the subject's live music department to be notable in this instance.--SamHolt6 (talk) 05:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH. - Mar11 (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.