Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Sang-hak

=[[Park Sang-hak]]=

:{{la|Park Sang-hak}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Park_Sang-hak Stats])

:({{Find sources|Park Sang-hak}})

I personally don't think that this defector is more notable that the many others Travelbird (talk) 04:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete not notable. failsWP:BIO --Sue Rangell 21:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Seeing as he was the likely target of a highly publicised assassination attempt, he has gained quite some publicity, i.e. has become notable not only for the North Korean government. Trigaranus (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Once again, in that respect, WP:ONEVENT 05:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public) talk 00:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran talk to me! 09:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete. A passing mention in a news event does not make a person notable. 1292simon (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.