Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parvum opus
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus states that this should not be on Wikipedia; if anyone wants the information that will be deleted. please contact me. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
=[[Parvum opus]]=
:{{la|Parvum opus}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Parvum opus}})
A dicdef for a fairly obscure and little used latinismus. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Transwiki to Wiktionary, as suggested in the article. I could find no coverage beyond a few usage examples. But if Strunk and White use it, that seems enough for Wiktionary. There is a Parvum Opus company, but it appears to not be notable, either. --Mark viking (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Transwiki also as this is not yet convincing for its own notable Wikipedia article. SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Transwiki - No evidence of notability to warrant an article however shoving it to WT is better than deleting forever where it'd probably be forgotten. –Davey2010Talk 23:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree that this is an ephemeral bit of Latin trivia. I don't have a particular opinion either way as to wanting to put the information somewhere off of Wikipedia, though I should note that I'm not opposed to the idea. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.