Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paschal Preston
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
=[[Paschal Preston]]=
:{{la|Paschal Preston}} – (
:({{Find sources|Paschal Preston}})
No evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:PROF criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Citation impact [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Paschal+Preston%22 indicates notability]. Has an h-index of 15 on GS.--Eric Yurken (talk) 15:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I think that Preston passes WP:AUTHOR as he has written multiple books that have been reviewed in publications such as the European Journal of Communication and Progress in Human Geography. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 15:08, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Keep. Meets WP:PROF #1 (see google scholar cites above) and WP:AUTHOR (see EricEnfermero note above). Harrison2014 (talk) 16:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep but needs cogent formatting. Maybe a bullet point list of his books?PatrickGuinness (talk) 14:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn - please close per all above. Thanks for your contributions, Boleyn (talk) 08:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.