Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunk

:{{la|Patafunk}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patafunk}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Patafunk}})

Fails WP: BAND, refs mainly consists of non independent, not reliable sources. Also see the EL, its mainly stuff written by the group itself. Unioneagle (talk) 02:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

• Keep – It was me who declined the speedy deletion after reading what was presented on the talk page. There is coverage in Spinner.com, a chart hit in Venezuela (see link on the talk page), and I also found a brief mention in Billboard (vol. 122, iss. 9, p. 12). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep – To help with building a consensus, I'll throw my hat in with Paul Erik above. The sources are fairly slight and the band has not been noticed too much outside of their native land, but WP is meant to be an international resource. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.