Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Blessinger

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

=[[Patrick Blessinger]]=

:{{la|Patrick Blessinger}} ([{{fullurl:Patrick Blessinger|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Blessinger}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Not enough secondary sources to fulfill notability criteria. A Fullbright scholar and "Honorary Rotarian." Is a Fullbright scholar automatically notable? Probably not, in my opinion. Contested prod. Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 05:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Weak delete - This definitely walks the line between notability and non-notability, but I'm leaning towards a delete. Firstly, I don't think being a Fullbright Scholar entails notability simply because it is not a membership of a prestigious society per WP:PROF, but seems to describe someone who has received a grant from the Fulbright Program. Secondly, I can't find evidence that his research has made a significant impact (see [http://scholar.google.com.sg/scholar?hl=en&lr=&client=firefox-a&q=%22Active+Learning+Pyramid+Model%22&btnG=Search this google search]). Thirdly, the highest he got in the corporate world seems to be team leader, with a intra-company award. In short, I don't think there's enough evidence for notability. -Samuel Tan 06:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - it does walk the line per WP:PROF (lack of published research), but I think part of the notability claimed is being the first (only?) educator in the technical college system in US to be selected a Fulbrighter. No apparent impact in the published research area but does appear to have had a somewhat significant impact in the higher education system in Georgia per the references - WP:NPF, there does seem to be "Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive". The article needs to be edited to remove any unverifiable statements/claims to not oeverstate the notability... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.35.42 (talk) 08:12, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

:*Note. This user has made few or no other edits outside of this topic.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

::*Further Note. This [http://samspade.org/whois/90.184.35.42 IP traces] to Denmark, the subject's residence, which raises the possibility of COI?--Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete nothing comes up in [http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Patrick+Blessinger%22 Google scholar]. LibStar (talk) 13:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)\
  • Delete. Adjunct prof. at Capella University who passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO. The Fulbright award, although prestigious, is not at the level required for WP:PROF criterion #2.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Notable as neither an academic nor an executive. DGG (talk) 02:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep or delete I could not figure out whether this person has a Ph.D. degree. Otherwise looks ok with accomplishments --Saynara (talk) 21:29, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • No evidence of a Ph.D. Does that mean a delete !vote for you?--Jwilkinsen Jr (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes - I'm afraid. If you are a professor, I would except a Ph.D. for wiki notability. There could be good writers without a Ph.D., but still be wiki notable. May be they do not want to apply for a Ph.D or they do not have time to apply for a Ph.D.--Saynara (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Have to agree this one is marginal. If a better case is made I may change my mind. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC).
  • Delete Definite Delete. Does not come close to meeting notability criteria. Johndowning (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.