Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lambie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Patrick Lambie]]=

:{{la|Patrick Lambie}} ([{{fullurl:Patrick Lambie|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lambie}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Subject is an U19 rugby player, which is not a high enough level to meet WP:ATH, nor the criteria set out at the Rugby Union Wikiproject. I had tagged the article for cleanup (for various obvious reasons), but after a few searches it became apparent that inclusion isn't merited. A lot of the claims in the article are simply not supported and the tone shows sign of bias; the subject doesn't seem to be as notable as this article would lead us to believe. one brave monkey 12:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Football "prospect" ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete As nominator says, does not meet WP:ATHLETE. Furthermore, article's claims of notability and press coverage are not backed up by references to meet WP:GNG. Ray^Talk 18:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.