Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pattyboy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Pattyboy]]=

:{{la|Pattyboy}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Pattyboy}})

Apparently non-notable Internet celebrity with dubious claims of notability Rymatz (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - A YouTube hit is not really notability. ItsZippy (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete The claim in the article that "The video received international media attention including from the New York Times." is not supported by a search of news sources. I could find no evidence of any "international media attention". --Pontificalibus (talk) 17:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment In addition to the one arguably good source currently in the article (stuff.co.nz), I found the following from [http://socialmedianz.com/opinion2/2011/05/17/in-defense-of-patty-boy-nzs-answer-to-rebecca-black/ SocialMediaNZ] which looks like it could be worked into the article. I was ready to !vote Delete on this article, but after finding this second source, I'm not so sure. Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:05, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 09:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.