Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ascher

:{{la|Paul Ascher}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paul_Ascher Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Paul Ascher}})

• Queryable speedy delete as "not notable". He was a WWII German naval officer. He is listed in the pages Mischling and Honorary Aryan and List of Nazis of non-Germanic descent. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete this article to the best of my knowledge has never had one reference

i think that the iron cross first class is not notable as per wp:soldier as it was not the nazi germany's highest award for valor which is Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross

I think that it also fails notability as Paul aschers rank was not a flag, general or air officer, as per wp:soldier

The only reason to keep is that Paul ascher may have Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign

However this was never referenced in the article ever and i cannot find a suitable reference.

Perhaps an other editor can find a reference or a rationale to keep otherwise i say delete

On retrospect this may be a suitable reference http://www.kbismarck.com/crew/paulascher.html i am still a new user and learning please ping me if this is a suitable reference

Sassmouth (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete I agree that the subject fails notability. A Google search provide no information to establish notability. Although the site kbismarck.com [http://www.kbismarck.com/crew/paulascher.html] does reference the subject, it does not provide any information concerning notability. Cbs527 (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable for stand alone article; mention of his name and position in the battleship Bismarck article is sufficient. Kierzek (talk) 13:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as not likely to be notable per WP:SOLDIER. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete -- not senior enough to be notable per se, unless he did something specially notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:00, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- I'm only seeing trivial mentions insufficient to establish encyclopedia notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.