Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Byron

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. everyone seems to agree on this one DGG (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Paul Byron]]=

:{{la|Paul Byron}} ([{{fullurl:Paul Byron|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Byron}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

NN ice hockey player TexasAndroid (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable amateur player who has yet to play professionally so fails to meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:N. Also fails WP:HOCKEY's guidelines for player notablity WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Can be recreated when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. -Djsasso (talk) 03:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete per prior precedent: Examples include 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and at least 25 other AfDs for similar players. When/If this player wins a major award or plays in a fully professional league, then this article can be recreated, until then, he is not notable per WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. -Pparazorback (talk) 03:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable; promotional. Renee (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Cs-wolves (talk) 04:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Has yet to play pro or otherwise achieve notability, etc etc. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 04:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment. Is making the 2nd All-Star team in the Q a notable achievement per WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE? [http://admin.lhjmq.qc.ca/navcache/getcontents.php?currentpath=%2Froot%2FHonneurs%2FLHJMQ_Trophee_EqEtoil_200809_20090401.pdf&content=view Source.] Patken4 (talk) 14:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

:First team would be, according to our guideline. Second team, no. --Smashville^talk 13:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Fails to meet WP:ATHLETE, WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE and precedent. --Smashville^talk 13:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.